I have often said that no matter
how Bud Selig and Baseball try to kill the proverbial
golden goose, the sport continues to flourish. Don't
ask me how but you cannot argue ratings and attendance.
Even with some of the smaller market
teams dragging down averages, the numbers are simply
astounding in any case.
Sadly, MLB could care less about
you, the fan, and like robots you do as you are programmed
by your parents or commercials on the tube or voice
box. Like soldiers under orders from high above, you
follow blindly.
Your pocket gets picked at the box
office, more so by some unscrupulous owners, you pay
for subscription services via cable/satellite or on
the Internet and you don't get the full benefit of it
like the other 200,000 or so who open their wallets
yearly, two leagues with different rules and of course
a first round postseason that defies logic.
Let's start with the latter and
work backwards as the regular season is about to end.
The change began back in 1969 when
two separate divisions were created due to expansion.
Fundamentally, the rules still remained the same because
it was like the New York Lottery, "You have to win it
to be in it." In other words, second place meant October
tee times instead of reporting to the park.
We had already crossed the threshold
of plastic grass, elimination of scheduled doubleheaders,
Ladies Day and some of the old traditions so even though
there were more teams, some traditions were holding
true.
I hated the changes, not the more
teams but how some of those traditions were being trampled
using "progress" as the catch phrase.
Progress in the National Pastime
reared its ugly head when it had a football epiphany.
It was called the wild card when those two divisions
in each league went to three. Other than outs, innings
and runs scored, odd numbers are, well, odd.
There were thirty teams by then
meaning the American and National Leagues had a dilemma.
Actually, it was Commissioner Bud Selig.
Any way you slice it, six divisions,
thirty teams and in simple math that comes down to five
teams in each. Rather odd, wouldn't you say? Selig was
an odd fellow to begin with as he was an owner of a
team who just happened to be the commissioner, an odd
conflict of interest.
The resolution was to move a team
from one league to the other to make it all even but
in another odd turn of events it was Selig's team, the
Milwaukee Brewers, that got their ticket punched from
the A.L. to the star-studded senior circuit.
Be that as it may, you now had unbalanced
leagues with unbalanced schedules and rules that were
different in each. Odd.
For some years there was talk about
contraction, the elimination of two teams in order to
bring back equality but there were no John F. Kennedys
or Martin Luther Kings around. Jackie Robinson was long
gone from the game too. Equality to Selig was being
odd.
As expansion was out of the question
- add two and you get four, four team divisions returning
tradition of being a winner to play extra games - it
didn't take rocket science to see that keeping the 5x6=30
was not such a bad deal after all if someone had used
their head.
Interleague play was already in
vogue, so much for baseball's version of the separation
of church and state, but instead of using it to an advantage
keeping the odd as a positive, it was ignored which
was really odd.
You take the teams with the worst
record in each league from the year before and they
play each other on the final homestand of the year to
keep the integrity of the schedule. The 16-teams in
one league and 14 in the other looks like a teeter-totter
with an adult on once side and a child on the other.
It's odd.
However, what is more odd is once
you get through the regular season the playoff system
had to come from the mind of a bunch of guys who had
too much of their adult beverage sponsors.
All other sports, and I do mean
ALL, set their postseason sked based on seedings. One
plays eight; two plays seven and so on. Baseball, on
the other hand is a numbers based games and they had
a problem with the basic concept.
You have three division winners
and a Wild Card, in other words a second place team.
A runner-up. In any world, except baseball, that runner-up
is the last of the four teams when it comes to setting
the seeds.
Not so, mon ami, not so.
If you are the Yankees winning the
East with the best record in the league and the Red
Sox finish as the Wild Card, one and four could be from
different planets as far as the powers that be are concerned.
Convoluted. Odd too.
So now we have learned that those
making seven figures and up do not know how to count,
they have one sport with two separate sets of rules
and it is simply called the designated hitter.
The rule was originally designed
to keep the older stars in the game longer and over
the years it has become the biggest albatross around
the neck of Major League Baseball. The first was Ron
Bloomberg who became the first to step in the batter's
box with his position in the scorebook listed as DH
on April 6, 1973 at Fenway Park while a member of the
Yankees.
I do not feel one way or the other
about designated hitters as such, I just cringe when
the World Series rolls around and it is used in games
played in A.L. parks and not when it goes over to the
senior circuit's yard. It becomes more trivial now that
an exhibition, the All Star Game, decides on who has
home field advantage in the Fall Classic.
Very odd indeed.
Forget that fans now get to vote
on how the first round of the playoffs is to be conducted,
we have reached the bottom of the barrel when it comes
to common sense.
Then again, no one ever said that
Selig had a full deck to play with the way he looked
away in the steroid era then proclaimed in front of
Congress he wanted to rid his sport of it after a gazillion
fans had already flipped the turnstiles padding bank
accounts of his Brewers and the rest of his owner sidekicks.
But how odd is it that the sport
sold its soul to DirecTV and after a serious outcry
from fans and politicians, cable outlets got it back
for their subscribers. That was the first salvo launched
across the bow of the sport's fans. The cost jumped
roughly 25% and that was in part to launch a 24x7 baseball
channel that was two years from launch.
P.T. Barnum said it when he pointed
to suckers being born every day.
Fans get ripped off again yet they
dig into wallets like disposable cash was more important
than buying school books for their kids. Stand up soldiers,
General Selig has issued marching orders like placing
orders for Extra Innings.
So now you are the proud owner of
MLBEI. You can watch hundreds, thousands of games. You
are no longer baseball challenged; you are an owner
of sorts.
Wanna bet?
It only happens a handful of times
during the season when your home team is not telecast
locally either on cable or over the air stations while
they are on the road. So you look up the MLBEI schedule
and you see the game is available on the other team's
outlet.
You dial in at game time and then
find out the game is "not available in your market."
What?
When you think about it, you are
purchasing a yearly pay-per-view accessible daily.
If the game is not on in your area,
there are no advertising revenues lost. And just because
it is available on radio, the ratings and ad rates are
apples and oranges, the squawk box revenues are dramatically
different than their boob tube counterparts.
So why is there a blackout rule
in this instance?
Then there is the issue of high-definition.
Recently the Devil Rays hosted the
Yankees at Tropicana Field and was carried on ION-66
in Tampa Bay. The game was being shot back to New York
in HD but not in the home team's region.
The local HD station on DirecTV
had the Marlins game in HD and two clicks down on the
MLBEI HD, there it was again. Double your pleasure,
right? Do I watch it on 96 or 94? Odd. I never realized
I could watch the game twice at the same time.
Now on Channel 95, the show description
said Yankees at Devil Rays and a box appeared saying
this wasn't available for me to watch.
A game played six miles from my
house is in standard definition while fans 1,100 miles
away can see it in 1080i.
Who do you blame? How do you complain?
I've tried and it falls on deaf ears. Especially when
I point out that I want to watch a road game that is
available and not on locally. What the hell am I paying
for?
Blackouts are for cities that lose
electricity, not for the sports fan that pays extra
for the privilege of watching out of town games they
so prominently say in their ads to sell the service.
Anyone heard of bait and switch?
When it comes to baseball, fans
have been getting the short end of the stick for quite
some time but many of you just sit there and take it.
Why? Don't care? Enjoy throwing away money?
Odd.